.png)
Teaming agreements open doors that are closed to contractors working alone. A small IT firm partners with a construction company to pursue a complex base modernization contract. A certified WOSB adds a cybersecurity specialist to its team and qualifies for a solicitation it could not win independently. The principle is straightforward: the right partnership expands what you can pursue.
But teaming in federal contracting comes with rules. The SBA's affiliation and ostensible subcontractor regulations got meaningful updates in 2025, and contractors who have not revisited their teaming documentation since then may be carrying compliance gaps they do not know about.
Here is how teaming agreements work, what compliance requires, and what changed.
If you work for a federal contractor and your contract is coming up for recompete, someone in your office is probably nervous. Maybe that someone is you. You've heard the term "recompete" and you know it means something is changing, but you're not sure what it actually means for your paycheck, your clearance, or whether you'll still have a job in six months.
You found an RFI on SAM.gov. You spent two days pulling together a thoughtful response: your capabilities, your experience, your interest in the requirement. You hit submit.
And then nothing.
No confirmation. No follow-up. No "thanks for your input." Just silence.
SDVOSB certification gives veteran-owned businesses access to billions in set-aside contracts, but the process is rarely straightforward. Applications face significant rejection risks, and success depends less on veteran status itself and more on whether your documents align to show ownership and control. The good news: the SBA cleared its VetCert backlog in late 2025 and reduced processing times to an average of just 12 days, down from the 60 to 90 days that was typical throughout most of 2024 and early 2025.
If you have been searching SAM using IT product service codes from a training you took two years ago, there is a good chance your market research has gaps in it right now.
In April 2024, the federal government restructured its entire IT services PSC framework. Sixty-eight legacy codes were end-dated. Forty new codes replaced them. The naming convention changed completely. And most small IT contractors have no idea it happened.
This guide explains what PSC codes are, what changed, and exactly how to update your market research so you stop missing opportunities coded under the new system.
You've heard it a hundred times. You've probably said it yourself.
"I can't win federal contracts because I don't have past performance. And I can't get past performance without winning federal contracts."
It sounds like an unbreakable loop. A catch-22 that keeps new businesses locked out of a $700 billion federal marketplace while the same established contractors win the same contracts year after year.
Here's what nobody's telling you: that narrative is wrong.
Defense contractors face a critical verification challenge that most don't recognize until it costs them. When you hire someone who claims Secret clearance, you're operating on trust until the security office confirms their status. That gap between hire date and verification creates liability, delays contract staffing, and occasionally reveals candidates who've misrepresented their clearance history entirely.
Most federal contractors waste 60-70% of their business development time pursuing opportunities they'll never win. They're searching SAM with basic keywords, seeing thousands of results, and chasing contracts that don't match their capabilities, past performance, or competitive positioning.
In today's federal contracting environment, the difference between contractors who win consistently and those who struggle isn't capabilities; it's intelligence. Successful contractors know their competitors' contract portfolios, understand pricing trends in their market segments, track key personnel movements, and identify teaming opportunities before solicitations release.
